Disrupt the stability of East Asia, what about the responsibility of Abe

Xinhua Beijing April 18 (Reporter Li Xuemei) Japanese Prime Minister Cheap Jordan Beanies Shinzo Abe often throw some absurd statement, such as last year's "aggression no definition of" theory, such as this year's survey reflect the requirements of "comfort women" issue. " Kono Statement ", have made the world look askance. According to Kyodo News, the 17th and splendor, he said the world should make joint efforts to promote China as a "responsible country."

whether China a responsible world do not know how many million pairs of eyes watching. From the contribution made by the world economic recovery to carry out mutually beneficial cooperation with other countries from seeking a political solution to the Syrian crisis to push the Iranian nuclear impasse years icebreaking, from relations among major powers to build a new pro-Cheng Hui Yung surrounding foreign policy ......

Numerous facts show that China is a courage to play, the pursuit of win-win situation, adhere to the road of peaceful development of responsible power. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon made it clear Cheap NHL T-Shirt that China is a permanent member of the UN Security Council, bear an important international responsibilities, the five permanent members to send peacekeepers most countries.

contrast Cheap Womens NFL T-Shirt Abe government, regardless of South Korea or Japan suffered against other Asian countries, not to mention repeatedly refused to bear the historical responsibility for committing numerous crimes of aggression, now altogether more directly in the language and actions to beautify history of aggression on the territory again to confuse the issue, and thus negate Cheap Adidas Beanies the outcome of World War II, the postwar challenge the order.

Under

gorgeous "active pacifism" rhetoric, what Abe government efforts to promote Japan's military expansion in the constitutional amendment, the ambition of trying to change the status Cheap NFL Hats quo by force gradually becoming visible. Especially since the end of last year, Abe government continuously develop "National Security Strategy", "National Defense Program Outline", "mid-term defense force preparedness plan" and many other parts of the military and security documents, security policy towards Japan to promote qualitative change.

What is more, to get rid of prohibited war pacifist constitution, Japan constraints Abe Cabinet also prepare the cover of darkness to modify the interpretation of the Constitution in the form of the government ban on collective self-defense. 1st of this month, Abe government formally adopted "three principles of the transfer of defense equipment," completed the "principle of the prohibition of" weapons exports to the "principle of the ban" arms exports 180-degree turn.

More and more facts indicate that it is the government's actions Abe irresponsibly undermine regional stability. Survey results, "Asahi Shimbun" published recently, Liu Cheng Japanese people think Abe Cabinet's ruling attitude detrimental to peace and stability in East Asia. American Bard College journalism professor Ian Buruma recently published an article saying:.. "Abe upset the original unstable Asian air", "Japanese Prime Minister is playing a very dangerous game"

an unwilling country responsible for war crimes, how could responsible for peace in the region? A refusal to bear the historical responsibility of national leaders, and how reality could bear the responsibility?